The Google Pixel 2 XL is the best Android phone I still hesitate to recommend.
Google’s 2017 flagship nails software, camera, and audio so hard it made Samsung and Apple scramble. But it also shipped with a display that would’ve been questionable on a mid-ranger, let alone an $850 “Android purist” halo device.
This isn’t just a history lesson. The Pixel 2 XL is the blueprint for how Google treats its own hardware: incredible software, aggressive pricing for a small audience, and one glaring compromise that users are expected to swallow.
Design, Hardware, And The LG Factor
Google’s second large Pixel ditched the Nexus-era experimentation and locked into a clean, utilitarian aesthetic. The back is a mix of metal with Google’s “Premium Hybrid Coating” and a small glass window at the top. The Just Black model is exactly that—no gray or charcoal tricks—just matte, grippy, and unapologetically practical.
The 6-inch 18:9 P-OLED panel sits under 3D Gorilla Glass 5 that tapers past the metal frame. It looks good on a desk, but that raised glass is just begging for damage if you ever set it face-down without a case. Above and below the display are front-firing stereo speakers, with the earpiece doubling as one of the drivers. There’s an 8MP f/2.4 selfie camera up front, and a single rear camera with a protruding ring that calls back to the LG Nexus 5.
And that’s not a coincidence: the Pixel 2 XL is built by LG. No antenna lines, clean sides, rear fingerprint scanner, IP67 water resistance, and no headphone jack. Google throws a USB-C to 3.5mm adapter in the box, a USB-C Power Delivery charger, and an OTG “Quick Switch” dongle to migrate from your old phone. Premium specs for 2017? Snapdragon 835, 4GB of RAM, Cat 15 LTE, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, eSIM for Project Fi, and a 3,520 mAh battery.
On paper, Google finally joined the big leagues. In practice, it also inherited LG’s OLED baggage.
The P-OLED Problem: Blue Shift And Bland Colors
The Pixel 2 XL’s 6-inch QHD+ (1440 x 2880) P-OLED at 538 ppi should have been a Daydream VR showcase. Instead, it turned into a case study in how much display compromise a flagship buyer will tolerate.
Brightness peaks at 496 nits—solid, with infinite OLED contrast and good sunlight legibility, even beating the LG V30 and edging past the Note8 outdoors. But Samsung’s Galaxy S8 and S8+ still get brighter with their auto-boost modes, and more importantly, they don’t fall apart off-axis.
Tilt the Pixel 2 XL even a little—around 15 degrees—and a harsh greenish-blue shift sweeps over the screen. Top and bottom angles are slightly kinder, but not by much. The LG V30 shows nearly identical behavior, while a Note8 panel stays clean. That kills any “OLED limitation” excuse; this is a panel and tuning problem, not a technology problem.
Color accuracy isn’t a strength either. Average deltaE sits at 3.8 with a max of 5.5, but the real issue is tuning. Even in the default “Vivid” mode, colors are unusually muted for an OLED. They look dull next to Samsung’s phones or even other 2017 competitors. And Google doesn’t offer granular controls—no individual color profiles, no slider to push saturation the way Samsung and LG do in their skins.
Then there’s burn-in. Early users reported UI element ghosts—navigation bar, status icons—sticking around after just days. Google’s response was to cap peak brightness by roughly 50 nits and tweak software: dimmed nav keys in Android 8.1 and other mitigations. That helps, but again, you’re paying flagship money for a panel that needs workarounds.
The Pixel 2 XL’s screen isn’t unusable; head-on, it’s fine, with solid contrast and acceptable sharpness. But on a device pitched as Google’s best possible vision of Android at $850, “fine if you stare straight at it” simply isn’t good enough.
Oreo, Assistant, And Google’s Vision Of Android
If the screen is where the Pixel 2 XL stumbles, software is where it absolutely steamrolls the competition.
This phone shipped with Android 8.0 Oreo, and unlike near-stock ROMs from other OEMs, this is Google’s own build—no vendor skins, no carrier bloat. The UI is tighter and more mature than on the first Pixel: reorganized Settings categories (like the consolidated “Network & Internet”), smoother animations, and smarter notification controls.
The Pixel Launcher moves the Google Search bar down between the app dock and the nav buttons, actually within thumb reach. The weather/date widget becomes a ticker with upcoming events. The app drawer is a swipe-up gesture with a top row of frequently used apps, alphabetical lists, and an embedded search field.
Notifications and Quick Settings feel like what every OEM is trying to copy: actionable notifications with inline replies, per-app notification channels, and an always-on display that shows icons for pending alerts and, optionally, the name of the currently playing song.
That “Now Playing” feature is classic Google: an offline, region-specific music database under 100MB that lets the phone listen every 60 seconds and identify tracks without sending audio to the cloud. It’s privacy-conscious and genuinely useful.
Active Edge—the squeeze gesture borrowed from HTC’s Edge Sense—triggers Google Assistant even when the phone is asleep. Unlike HTC, Google locks it to Assistant. No custom actions, no remapping. It’s the same heavy-handed strategy Samsung uses with the Bixby button. The tech works; the control is the problem.
Google Lens is sprinkled in as a preview inside Google Photos. It’s a mix of the old Google Goggles and Now on Tap: point it at landmarks, emails, or text in photos and it attempts to recognize context, fill out calendar events, or pull info. In testing, it failed on the Great Wall of China but nailed the Palace Museum. It’s early and inconsistent, but the direction is clear—Google wants Assistant and Lens to be how you interact with your content, not just your apps.
And through it all, the phone stays fast. The underclocked Snapdragon 835 (2.35 GHz instead of 2.45 GHz on the performance cluster) and 4GB RAM don’t win benchmarks, but they don’t have to. Day-to-day use is snappy, multitasking is smooth, gaming is handled without issue, and the 10nm chip doesn’t run hot the way the Snapdragon 820 did. The Pixel 2 XL warms slightly under the rear glass during heavy loads, then quickly cools.
This is the template: clean Android, three years of software updates, and smart features that are actually tied to Google’s ecosystem, not random OEM experiments.
Battery, Audio, And The Camera That Set The Bar
Battery life is quietly one of the Pixel 2 XL’s biggest wins. The 3,520 mAh cell only grows about 2% over the original Pixel XL, but Android 8.0’s standby improvements and Qualcomm’s 10nm efficiency combine for an 88-hour endurance rating.
Talk time is worse than the first Pixel XL by about 7 hours, but web browsing hits 10:29 and video playback 11:45—both better than before. That’s strong for a 6-inch QHD+ panel. Charging through USB Power Delivery 2.0 with the included 18W adapter gets you to 35% in 30 minutes and 71% in an hour. The curve is flatter than typical Quick Charge phones, which often slow heavily past 50%.
Audio is a mixed message on paper and a clear win in practice. The dual front-facing stereo speakers only measure “Good” in standardized loudness tests, but they’re clean even at max volume. The real firepower is in the wired output—through the USB-C to 3.5mm dongle. In lab testing, the Pixel 2 XL was among the loudest devices measured, to the point they had to step volume down for recording. It maintains high output and accurate reproduction both with an external amp and headphones, with minimal degradation.
This is the irony: Google killed the headphone jack, forced a dongle, and then shipped one of the best wired audio chains of its generation. There’s still no meaningful system-level EQ for tuning, which feels like a missed opportunity.
The camera is where Google flexes hardest. On paper, it’s simple: a single 12MP sensor with f/1.8 aperture, OIS, dual-pixel autofocus, dual LED flash, and 1.4µm pixels, plus an 8MP f/2.4 selfie camera that also uses large pixels. No manual or “Pro” mode, no shutter/ISO control—just tap-to-focus, an exposure slider with AE/AF lock, HDR+ always on, and Google’s algorithms doing the heavy lifting.
Daylight shots are excellent. Detail is high and, crucially, rendered more naturally than on Samsung’s Note8 and latest Galaxies. Foliage looks like foliage, not smeared plastic. The trade-off is more visible noise when you zoom in, especially versus Samsung’s aggressive noise reduction.
HDR+ is the star. The Pixel 2 XL consistently preserves highlights—cloud detail, bright signage—better than rivals, and pulls usable detail out of shadows without turning the whole frame into HDR soup. Auto HDR+ is standard; HDR Off exists but is buried and largely pointless. HDR+ Enhanced takes it a bit further. In practice, leaving it on Auto as Google intends produces the cleanest, most reliable results.
Low light tells the same story: slightly noisier, more detailed photos with strong color retention and impressive dynamic range. Bright light sources are tamed more than you might expect, which can feel odd if you’re used to blown-out lamps, but it’s technically better.
Portrait mode is where Google weaponizes dual-pixel data and machine learning. With just one rear camera, the Pixel 2 XL generates depth maps by reading left/right pixel information and then layering on neural subject detection. Subject isolation is usually very good, with convincing background blur and variable bokeh strength based on distance. It works on people and many objects, though you get no live preview—you only see the effect after capture.
Selfies are excellent: detailed, with flattering skin tones, HDR+ helping in backlit scenes, and a front-facing portrait mode that relies entirely on ML. It still manages to separate faces from backgrounds with surprising accuracy.
Video capture is strong but not flawless. The Pixel 2 XL records 4K at 30fps (about 41Mbps), 1080p at 60 or 30fps (around 33Mbps and 21.5Mbps respectively), and 720p at 240fps or 1080p at 120fps for slow motion. 4K footage is sharp and natural without overprocessing, with accurate white balance and balanced color. 1080p/30 is also competitive. 1080p/60, though, is softer than the Note8 and iPhone 8 Plus.
The real complaint: mono audio at 96Kbps. On a flagship-class phone, that’s lazy—especially when you’re asking premium pricing.
Pricing, Competition, And Who The Pixel 2 XL Was Really For
The Pixel 2 XL launched from $850 in the US, in the same era where Samsung’s Galaxy Note8 was pushing past that and Apple’s iPhone X started at $999. The whole industry was testing how far they could raise prices without scaring off loyal users.
Google’s move from Nexus to Pixel was a clear statement: this is no longer the value line; this is the aspirational hardware for people who want the “official” Android experience. That comes with higher expectations. Availability was limited, with Verizon still owning the exclusive in the US, even though unlocked units were sold directly by Google.
On features, the Pixel 2 XL filled most of the gaps from the first Pixel XL: IP67 water resistance, stereo speakers, OIS, a modern 18:9 display, and a slightly larger battery. In exchange, you lost the headphone jack and gained a questionable OLED panel.
The alternatives in the same window tell the story:
- First-gen Pixel XL: cheaper, still fast, great camera, no portrait mode, no OIS, smaller battery, no IP rating, but direct Google updates. For many, still enough.
- OnePlus 5: near-stock feel, Snapdragon 835, 6/8GB RAM, strong battery, lower price, but no CDMA (so no Verizon/Sprint) and a weaker update story.
- Galaxy Note8: superb Super AMOLED, S-Pen, dual camera, IP68, headphone jack, wireless charging, but heavier software and slower major updates.
- Galaxy S8+: similar size and same display class as Note8 minus S-Pen and dual cam, still a strong alternative.
- iPhone 8 Plus: ultra-fast A11 chip, reliable battery, and Apple’s ecosystem, but dated hardware design if you’re crossing platforms.
- Smaller Pixel 2: same processor, same camera, better-looking display, smaller body, $200 cheaper. If you didn’t need a 6-inch screen, it was objectively the smarter Pixel buy.
- LG V30: nearly identical size and battery, wide-angle secondary rear camera, strong video tools, same basic display tech but tuned better than the Pixel 2 XL’s implementation.
For Android enthusiasts who care about clean software, fast updates, and camera performance above all else, the Pixel 2 XL is still a landmark device. It’s also a warning shot: even Google will ship a flawed display and call it acceptable if it means hitting the launch window and margin targets.
If you were on a first-gen Pixel XL back then, the blunt truth is that you weren’t wrong to hold off. You gained a better camera, stereo speakers, and water resistance, but you also took on an $850 price tag and a compromised screen.
The Pixel 2 XL proved Google can nail the Android experience better than anyone—but it also proved that “best software” doesn’t excuse hardware shortcuts, especially when you’re charging flagship money.
Stay tuned to IntoDroid for more Android updates.