Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 just turned Android tablets into a one-chip league.
Snapdragon Owns the Podium in May 2026
AnTuTu’s latest ranking of the 10 fastest Android tablets for May 2026 is basically a Qualcomm highlight reel. Six of the top six devices are powered by Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and they’re not just edging out the rest — they’re stacking the leaderboard.
Vivo Pad 6 Pro takes first place with an average score of 4,132,607. That makes it AnTuTu’s top-performing Android tablet for the entire May 1–31 test window. Right behind it, the iQOO Pad 6 Pro lands in second with 4,081,031 points, only about 51,576 behind the Vivo.
Rounding out the podium, Lenovo’s Legion Tablet Y700 Gen 5 posts 4,073,338 points. All three are running Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, which sets the tone for the rest of the list: if you want raw benchmark numbers right now, you’re probably buying Snapdragon.
Top 10 Breakdown: Small Gaps, Same Silicon
Below the top three, the same chipset keeps showing up. Oppo Pad 5 Pro holds fourth with 4,021,900 points, and the OnePlus Tablet 3 Pro is right behind it in fifth at 4,019,015. Honor’s MagicPad 3 Pro 13.3 completes the Snapdragon sweep of the top six at 3,717,674.
So the first five devices are all above the 4 million mark, except Honor’s tablet, which trails the fifth-place OnePlus by about 300,000 points. That’s still not a massive gulf in the context of synthetic benchmarks, but it does mark a drop-off from the near-identical scores of the top five.
This clustering tells you a couple of things. One, OEMs using Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 are tuning these tablets to hit similar ceilings in AnTuTu. Two, any performance difference between, say, the Vivo Pad 6 Pro and the iQOO Pad 6 Pro is going to be marginal in practice unless software or thermals are wildly different.
MediaTek’s Lone Fighter: Redmi K Pad 2
The only device in the top 10 that breaks the Snapdragon pattern is Redmi K Pad 2, in seventh place with 3,716,562 points. It’s also the only tablet on the list powered by a MediaTek chip, the Dimensity 9500.
The interesting bit: Redmi K Pad 2’s score is extremely close to the Honor MagicPad 3 Pro 13.3 in sixth place. We’re talking a difference of just over 1,000 points — basically noise at this level. So even surrounded by Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 tablets, Dimensity 9500 isn’t being blown out.
That’s encouraging if you’re hoping for real competition in Android tablet silicon instead of Qualcomm vs. everyone-else-in-the-midrange. Redmi’s showing here suggests MediaTek can hang in the flagship tablet space, at least in synthetic workloads.
Intel Crashes the ARM Party
In eighth place, things get weird: the H3C MegaBook appears as the only tablet on the list powered by an Intel processor, specifically the Core Ultra 5 228V. It posts an AnTuTu score of 3,390,074.
That makes the MegaBook the only non-ARM entry in the ranking. While everything else is running smartphone-style SoCs, this one is using a PC-class Intel chip. Even so, it’s still trailing the Snapdragon and Dimensity tablets above it, at least in AnTuTu’s Android-focused workload.
Below it, in ninth and tenth, sit the Oppo Pad 4 Pro and OnePlus Tablet 2 Pro. Both run the previous generation of Snapdragon 8 Elite, and score 3,341,039 and 3,299,505 respectively. So the older Snapdragon generation is still competitive enough to make the top 10, but a clear step down from the Gen 5 wave.
Benchmarks vs Reality: How Much Do These Numbers Matter?
These rankings are based on performance tests collected between May 1 and May 31, 2026. As usual with AnTuTu, that means you’re looking at aggregate synthetic scores, not long-term thermal behavior, battery drain, or real-world app smoothness.
The narrow gaps at the top — especially among the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 tablets — suggest that in everyday use, the difference between first and fifth is going to be negligible. You’re not going to feel a 50,000‑point gap when you’re reading, streaming, or switching between social apps.
Where this might matter is in heavy sustained loads: long gaming sessions, multitasking with multiple demanding apps, or heavy productivity on external displays. But AnTuTu alone doesn’t tell you which tablet holds peak performance longer or which one throttles when it heats up.
So while Vivo Pad 6 Pro can wear the “fastest Android tablet on AnTuTu for May 2026” badge, you shouldn’t assume that automatically makes it the best choice for your use case. Software optimization, display quality, battery size, charging speeds, and long-term updates are still big unknowns here.
Snapdragon’s Lead Is Clear, But Not Untouchable
Qualcomm’s dominance in this list is obvious: six out of six at the top with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, plus two more entries powered by the previous Elite generation. From a pure performance marketing standpoint, Qualcomm gets to claim the Android tablet benchmark crown for May without any spin.
But the details leave space for cautious optimism about competition. MediaTek’s Dimensity 9500, via Redmi K Pad 2, basically ties the lowest-scoring Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 tablet in the top six. And Intel’s Core Ultra 5 228V, despite being an outlier, makes the list at all — which is notable in an Android space dominated by ARM.
If Redmi can sit near the top 6 with a single Dimensity tablet, more OEMs betting on MediaTek could keep Qualcomm’s pricing and power targets honest. And if manufacturers keep experimenting with Intel-based Android tablets, that’s one more pressure point on Qualcomm’s grip.
What This Means If You’re Tablet Shopping
If your only question is “What’s the fastest Android tablet on AnTuTu right now?”, the answer is simple: Vivo Pad 6 Pro. Right behind it, you’ve got a stack of Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 options from iQOO, Lenovo, Oppo, OnePlus, and Honor.
If you care about having something different, Redmi K Pad 2 and the H3C MegaBook are the interesting ones. Redmi shows that MediaTek Dimensity 9500 can keep up with Snapdragon’s elite tier, at least in benchmarks. The H3C MegaBook proves there’s still room for experimentation with Intel hardware in the Android world.
But until we see more on displays, battery life, thermals, and software polish, these numbers should be treated as a first filter, not a final verdict. High scores are nice; a tablet that still feels fast, cool, and responsive a year later is better.
Have thoughts on this? Share them in the comments.