Motorola Moto G (3rd Gen)

Into Droid 2 Comments

The Moto G (3rd Gen), released in 2015, was the third iteration of Motorola’s popular budget-friendly Moto G series. It built upon the success of its predecessors by offering a balanced mix of features and performance at an affordable price point. Here’s an in-depth review of the Moto G (3rd Gen):

Overview:

The Moto G (3rd Gen) continued Motorola’s tradition of providing a near-stock Android experience combined with decent hardware at a budget-friendly price. This model introduced some key improvements over its predecessor, making it a compelling choice for those seeking a reliable budget smartphone.

Features:

  1. Operating System: Initially shipped with Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), later upgradable to Android 6.0 (Marshmallow).
  2. Display: 5.0-inch HD IPS LCD with a resolution of 720 x 1280 pixels.
  3. Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Quad-core.
  4. Memory: Options of 1 GB RAM with 8 GB storage or 2 GB RAM with 16 GB storage, expandable via microSD up to 32 GB.
  5. Camera: 13 MP rear sensor with an f/2.0 aperture and a 5 MP front camera.
  6. Battery: A 2470 mAh non-removable battery.
  7. Other Features: IPX7 water resistance, customizable shells, and a near-stock Android experience.

Pros:

  1. Water Resistance: The IPX7 rating was a standout feature, allowing the phone to be submerged in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes.
  2. Software Experience: The near-stock Android experience, combined with Motorola’s useful additions like Moto Display, was well-received.
  3. Build Quality: The device felt solid and durable, and the ability to customize the back shells added a touch of personalization.
  4. Price: The Moto G (3rd Gen) offered good value for its price, especially considering the features it packed.

Cons:

  1. Performance: While adequate for daily tasks, the Snapdragon 410 wasn’t the most powerful chipset, and the 1 GB RAM variant could feel sluggish at times.
  2. Display Resolution: The 720p resolution was acceptable but lagged behind some competitors offering Full HD displays in a similar price range.
  3. Camera Performance in Low Light: The camera struggled in low-light conditions, producing grainy images.

Comparisons to Other Technologies:

In its segment, the Moto G (3rd Gen) faced competition from:

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3: Offering a 5.5-inch Full HD display, Snapdragon 650, and a metal body.
  • Asus Zenfone 2: With its 5.5-inch Full HD display, Intel Atom processors, and 2 GB/4 GB RAM options.
  • Samsung Galaxy J5: Featuring a 5-inch HD display, Snapdragon 410, and Super AMOLED technology.

Launch Date:

The Moto G (3rd Gen) was announced and released in July 2015.

Common Issues/Problems:

  1. Performance Hiccups: Especially on the 1 GB RAM variant, users reported occasional slowdowns and stutters.
  2. Limited Storage: The base 8 GB storage variant left limited space for apps and media, making a microSD card almost essential.
  3. Average Speaker Quality: The front-facing speaker, while decently loud, wasn’t particularly rich in terms of audio quality.

Conclusion:

The Moto G (3rd Gen) was a testament to Motorola’s commitment to delivering a balanced smartphone experience at an affordable price. While it had its limitations, the device’s clean software, water resistance, and overall reliability made it a favorite among budget-conscious consumers. It continued the legacy of the Moto G series, proving that good smartphones didn’t always have to come with a high price tag.

Huawei P8 Lite

Into Droid Leave a comment

The Huawei P8 Lite, released in 2015, was a mid-range smartphone that aimed to offer a blend of decent specifications and an attractive design at a competitive price point. It was essentially a more affordable version of the flagship Huawei P8. Here’s an in-depth review of the Huawei P8 Lite:

Overview:

The Huawei P8 Lite was part of Huawei’s strategy to capture a larger share of the mid-range market. With its sleek design and competent specs, it aimed to provide a premium feel without the premium price tag.

Features:

  1. Operating System: Initially shipped with Android 5.0.2 (Lollipop) with Huawei’s EMUI 3.1 skin, later upgradable.
  2. Display: 5.0-inch HD IPS LCD with a resolution of 720 x 1280 pixels.
  3. Processor: Hisilicon Kirin 620 Octa-core.
  4. Memory: 2 GB RAM with 16 GB internal storage, expandable via microSD up to 128 GB.
  5. Camera: 13 MP rear sensor with an f/2.2 aperture and a 5 MP front camera.
  6. Battery: A 2200 mAh non-removable battery.
  7. Other Features: Dual SIM capability, 4G LTE support, and a slim profile.

Pros:

  1. Design: The P8 Lite boasted a slim and attractive design, with a combination of metal and plastic that gave it a premium feel.
  2. EMUI Customizations: Huawei’s custom skin, EMUI, brought a range of additional features and customizations to the Android experience.
  3. Camera: For its price, the 13 MP camera delivered decent shots in good lighting conditions.
  4. Expandable Storage: The inclusion of a microSD card slot allowed users to expand the device’s storage.

Cons:

  1. Battery Life: The 2200 mAh battery was on the smaller side, leading to average battery life.
  2. Display Resolution: The 720p resolution was a bit behind the times, especially when competitors were offering Full HD displays in a similar price range.
  3. Software Updates: Huawei was not the fastest when it came to providing Android version updates.

Comparisons to Other Technologies:

In its segment, the Huawei P8 Lite faced competition from:

  • Moto G (3rd Gen): Offering a 5.0-inch HD display, Snapdragon 410, and a near-stock Android experience.
  • Samsung Galaxy J5: Featuring a 5-inch HD display, Snapdragon 410, and Super AMOLED technology.
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3: With a 5.5-inch Full HD display, Snapdragon 650, and a metal body.

Launch Date:

The Huawei P8 Lite was announced in April 2015 and released shortly after.

Common Issues/Problems:

  1. Performance Hiccups: Some users reported occasional slowdowns, especially when multitasking.
  2. EMUI Bloat: While EMUI offered many features, it also came with a number of pre-installed apps that not everyone found useful.
  3. Average Low-Light Camera Performance: The camera struggled in low-light conditions, producing grainy and sometimes blurry images.

Conclusion:

The Huawei P8 Lite was a solid mid-range offering from Huawei. While it had its limitations, it provided a good balance of design, features, and performance for its price. For those who were fans of Huawei’s EMUI and were looking for a stylish yet affordable smartphone, the P8 Lite was a worthy consideration.

Android 2.2 Froyo (Frozen Yogurt)

Into Droid Leave a comment

Overview:

Android 2.2, affectionately named “Froyo” (short for Frozen Yogurt), was unveiled in May 2010. This version was a testament to Android’s maturation, focusing on performance enhancements, enterprise capabilities, and a range of user-friendly features.

History:

Following the success of Éclair, Google was keen to address both the consumer and enterprise segments of the market. Froyo was designed with this dual focus in mind, aiming to make Android faster, more efficient, and business-friendly.

Changes:

Froyo brought about a series of performance improvements and new features. The introduction of the Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler was particularly notable, significantly boosting the performance of Android devices.

First devices to receive the update:

The Nexus One, Google’s flagship device at the time, was among the first to receive the Froyo update. This device played a pivotal role in showcasing the best of what Android had to offer.

Features:

Android 2.2 Froyo introduced a myriad of features:

  • Just-In-Time (JIT) Compiler: This was a significant enhancement, improving device performance and application speed.
  • USB Tethering and Wi-Fi Hotspot: Allowed users to share their device’s internet connection.
  • Enhanced Microsoft Exchange support: Improved security, auto-discovery, and remote wipe capabilities catered to enterprise users.
  • Flash 10.1 support: Integrated support for Adobe Flash in the web browser improved multimedia web content accessibility.
  • App installation on SD card: Users could now save space by moving apps to the external storage.
  • Voice Actions: Users could use voice commands to perform actions like sending texts or playing music.

User Experience:

Froyo enhanced the overall user experience by making devices faster and more responsive, thanks to the JIT compiler. The ability to install apps on the SD card was a relief for many users struggling with internal storage space. Features like USB tethering and Wi-Fi hotspot functionality added layers of utility to Android devices.

Platform:

Android 2.2 continued its journey on the Linux kernel, emphasizing adaptability and open-source development. With Froyo, Android became more versatile, catering to both regular consumers and the enterprise segment.

Security:

Froyo took significant strides in security, especially with enhanced Microsoft Exchange support. Features like remote wipe and improved security policies were particularly important for businesses and enterprise users.

Reception:

Android 2.2 Froyo was well-received by both users and critics. The performance improvements were particularly praised, with many noting the noticeable speed boost in daily operations. The added enterprise features signaled Google’s intent to make Android a platform suitable for both personal and professional use.