Should Android Users Consider an iPhone in Indonesia Now?

Should Android Users Consider an iPhone in Indonesia Now?

If you’re an Android user in Indonesia eyeing an iPhone, you’re walking into a moving target.

Apple’s prices here don’t stay still for long, and early February 2026 is another reminder that timing and model choice matter more than brand logos.

Per a new price roundup from official distributors, the current iPhone lineup on sale in Indonesia stretches from around Rp 8 million for the cheapest model to about Rp 29 million for the most expensive.

What Snapshot Actually Tells You

We pulled current iPhone prices in Indonesia as of 9 February 2026 from several official distributors, with BliBli listed as one of the references.

The takeaway is simple but important: Apple’s Indonesian pricing is not static, and official partners tweak tags periodically.

That means anyone trying to compare iPhones against Android flagships or mid-rangers needs to think in terms of price bands, not some fixed “standard Apple price.”

Right now, official channels are stocking iPhone models from the 13 series up to the latest 17 series.

Across that spread, the cheapest officially sold iPhone starts in the Rp 8 million range, while the top-end models climb all the way to around Rp 29 million.

For context, that top bracket is basically ultra-premium territory in the Android world—where you’d usually be cross-shopping against top Snapdragon or Dimensity flagships with 120Hz OLEDs, big batteries, and multi-camera setups.

iPhone Lineup on Sale: 13 Series to 17 Series

The current official lineup in Indonesia covers:

  • iPhone 13 series
  • iPhone 14 series
  • iPhone 15 series
  • iPhone 16 series
  • iPhone 17 series
  • iPhone Air
  • iPhone 17 Pro
  • iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • iPhone 16 Plus
  • iPhone 16 Pro
  • iPhone 16 Pro Max

Breakdown groups them under price lists like:

  • Harga iPhone 17
  • Harga iPhone Air
  • Harga iPhone 17 Pro
  • Harga iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • Harga iPhone 16
  • Harga iPhone 16 Plus
  • Harga iPhone 16 Pro
  • Harga iPhone 16 Pro Max
  • Harga iPhone 15
  • Harga iPhone 14
  • Harga iPhone 13

We don’t get every individual number in that summary, but we do know the overall corridor: roughly Rp 8 million at the low end, and around Rp 29 million at the top.

So if you’re coming from Android, think of it like this:

  • That Rp 8 million band is where higher mid-range Android phones usually sit.
  • The Rp 20–29 million region is where ultra-premium Androids fight it out, and Apple’s Pro/Pro Max equivalents live.

Why These Price Bands Matter for Android Users

If you’re considering a switch from Android to iOS in Indonesia, those price bands set the reality check.

You’re not comparing a vague “iPhone experience” against a generic Android phone—you’re comparing a specific price tier.

For roughly Rp 8–10 million on Android, you’re typically looking at:

  • Good high-refresh displays
  • Solid main cameras
  • Decent performance for gaming and daily use

On the Apple side, that same entry bracket gets you into Apple’s ecosystem via older but still officially sold models like the iPhone 13 or 14 series.

You’re trading newer Android hardware features for longer iOS support and tighter ecosystem integration.

Move up closer to Rp 29 million and the comparison shifts.

In Android-land, that kind of money usually means top-tier SoCs, advanced camera systems, large batteries, and plenty of RAM and storage.

Apple’s answer in that bracket is its newest Pro and Pro Max models in the iPhone 17 lineup, plus variants like the iPhone 16 Pro Max.

You’re no longer asking if an iPhone can compete; you’re asking whether Apple’s particular mix of performance, camera tuning, and ecosystem is better for you than the maximalist feature lists you’d find on Android flagships at similar prices.

Official Distributors, Shifting Prices, and Availability

The report emphasizes that the listed prices are sourced from official distributors and can vary between them.

Some key points to keep in mind if you’re comparing iPhone and Android in Indonesia:

  • Prices differ across official partners: BliBli’s tags won’t necessarily match other authorized resellers.
  • Price changes are periodic: Apple’s local pricing environment shifts, so “February 2026 pricing” is a snapshot, not a promise.
  • Stock varies by model: Not every distributor will have every iPhone 13–17 variant on hand at the same time.

That same logic applies if you’re looking at Android flagships from Samsung, Xiaomi, or others.

Promo cycles, bank cashback, and online-only deals can all flip what “best value” means in any given week.

The important part is that Apple’s official price corridor is now clearly mapped out between roughly Rp 8 million and Rp 29 million, and any Android comparison has to sit somewhere on that same ladder.

Where This Leaves Android Buyers in Early 2026

For Android users, this February 2026 iPhone price snapshot in Indonesia is less about Apple itself and more about market positioning.

Apple is keeping older generations—iPhone 13, 14, 15—alive in the channel, while stacking newer iPhone 16 and 17 series models, plus Pro/Pro Max and Air variants, on top.

That gives Apple a continuous staircase from mid-upper prices to ultra-premium, directly overlapping with where high-end Android devices usually sit.

So your decision tree looks something like this:

  • If your budget caps near Rp 8 million, you’re essentially choosing between a new Android mid/high-range or an older-generation iPhone sold officially.
  • If you can go up to the mid/high teens or low twenties (in millions of rupiah), Android and iPhone both offer a lot of choice, but trade-offs differ: hardware flexibility vs software longevity and ecosystem.
  • If you’re comfortable around Rp 25–29 million, you’re already in “no-compromise” Android territory, and Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro/Pro Max and 16 Pro Max are the iOS equivalents in that same zone.

It’s reminder about shifting prices and distributor differences is the real takeaway.

Whether you’re staying on Android or flirting with iOS, lock in actual current prices from multiple official sources before you decide.

The spread—from around Rp 8 million to roughly Rp 29 million—tells you that the iPhone isn’t a single product competing with Android; it’s an entire stack of options that lines up across most of the high-value part of the Indonesian smartphone market.

Have thoughts on this? Share them in the comments.

Acerpure Clean V2 Lands in Indonesia With 20,000 Pa Suction

I’ve tested enough “smart” home gadgets that promised to fix my cleaning routine and ended up collecting dust instead of removing it. So when I saw Acer — a brand most of us associate with laptops and monitors — pushing a cordless vacuum cleaner in Indonesia, I raised an eyebrow. A 20,000 Pa wireless vacuum that can also groom your pets sounds useful on paper, but as usual, the real question is: what’s behind the spec sheet?

Acer Steps Deeper Into the Home With Acerpure Clean V2

Acer has officially launched the Acerpure Clean V2 Cordless vacuum cleaner in Indonesia. This is part of Acer’s broader Acerpure line, where the company has been slowly moving from traditional PCs into home-focused hardware.

The pitch is straightforward: a compact, lightweight cordless vacuum that can handle everyday dust, fine particles on furniture, and even double as a grooming tool for pets. The whole thing weighs around 1.37 kg, which puts it firmly in the lightweight category and should make it easier to use for longer sessions or overhead cleaning.

This isn’t a robot vacuum or a “smart” Android-connected gadget, but it’s clearly aimed at the same tech-aware audience that already buys phones, tablets, and IoT devices and now wants cleaner homes without hauling around a chunky 5 kg corded unit.

Core Specs: 20,000 Pa Suction and Cordless Convenience

On the performance side, Acerpure Clean V2 claims suction power of up to 20,000 Pa. In vacuum terms, that’s enough on paper to handle fine dust, dirt, and smaller particles stuck on household surfaces like carpets, sofas, and tables.

It’s cordless, so no cable wrangling while moving between rooms. Acer leans on that wireless design plus the low 1.37 kg weight as a key advantage, letting users reach higher shelves, curtain tops, or awkward corners that are usually a pain with traditional vacuums.

Is 20,000 Pa objectively impressive? The source doesn’t give us direct competitors to compare with, and there’s no runtime or battery capacity listed, so we can’t say how long that suction holds. All we know from Acer’s description is that this power level is positioned as enough for day-to-day home cleaning, not industrial deep cleaning.

Three Cleaning Modes for Different Scenarios

Acerpure Clean V2 offers three distinct modes:

  • Turbo
  • Standard
  • Eco and Pet

Turbo is clearly meant for heavier messes, carpets with embedded dust, or stubborn particles. Standard will likely be the go-to for routine floor and surface cleaning. Eco and Pet is where the messaging gets more interesting, because it’s tied to both efficiency and animal grooming.

We don’t get technical breakdowns of wattage or exact power per mode, so users will need to rely on Acer’s tuning here. The real test will be whether Eco and Pet mode is strong enough to actually collect pet hair effectively while remaining gentle enough for animal grooming.

Five Brush Heads, From Floors to Mattresses

Acerpure Clean V2 ships with five different brush types:

  1. A main brush for floors and carpets
  2. A narrow-gap brush for tight spaces
  3. A brush for sofas and smooth surfaces
  4. A mite-removal brush suitable for mattresses or beds
  5. A pet hair brush for grooming animals

The main brush handles general floor and carpet dust. The narrow-gap brush is for corners, crevices, and tight areas where dust usually builds up and larger heads can’t reach.

The sofa and smooth-surface brush is positioned for furniture like couches, tables, and other non-fabric flat areas. The mite-removal brush is targeted at mattresses and bedding — areas many people ignore but that collect dust and allergens over time.

On paper, this is a solid spread of tools, and Acer claims these brushes help users reach both high areas and tricky, hard-to-reach parts of the home. Without more mechanical details (like motorized vs passive brush heads), it’s hard to judge how aggressive the cleaning will be, but the attachment variety is at least competitive.

Pet Grooming: Clever Add-On or Just Marketing?

The most unusual part of Acerpure Clean V2 is the pet grooming feature. Acer includes a dedicated pet hair brush designed to clean and tidy animal fur, particularly for dogs and cats.

The brush is described as having soft bristles that are claimed to be safe for pets. The idea is to gently comb through your pet, lift loose or shedding fur, and simultaneously capture it into the vacuum so it doesn’t end up on sofas, carpets, or your clothes.

If it works as described, this could be extremely convenient for pet owners who are constantly fighting hair buildup at home. But there are a lot of unknowns: how noisy the vacuum is in Eco and Pet mode, how comfortable pets will actually feel, and how effective the brush is on long vs short hair.

Still, the concept makes sense. Instead of brushing and then vacuuming the floor afterward, you do both in one step. Acer is clearly targeting households with pets who already spend time grooming and cleaning.

Filtration: 5-Step Cyclone With HEPA

For dust handling, Acerpure Clean V2 uses a 5-step cyclone filtration system with a HEPA filter. The multi-stage cyclone layout is meant to separate larger particles first before they hit the finer filter stages, which can help maintain suction and reduce how often you have to clean or replace the HEPA element.

HEPA filtration is a must for people who care about allergens and very fine dust, and Acer is aligning itself with that standard. The source mentions the system can filter dust, including fine particles, but doesn’t specify filtration efficiency percentages or filter class.

Cyclone plus HEPA is a familiar combo in this category. Whether Acer’s implementation holds up in real world use will depend on airflow design and sealing quality — details we don’t get from the initial release.

Promising Package, Missing Real-World Numbers

Taken together, Acerpure Clean V2 looks like a sensible expansion for Acer in Indonesia: a lightweight, cordless vacuum with 20,000 Pa suction, three modes, five brush attachments, and a pet grooming twist.

On the cautious side, there are obvious gaps. The launch information doesn’t include battery specs, estimated usage time per mode, noise levels, charge time, dustbin capacity, or price. Without those, it’s impossible to say whether this is a budget-friendly alternative or trying to punch at premium cordless vacuums.

For Android and tech enthusiasts who already live in the Acer ecosystem, this could be an interesting way to bring a familiar brand into everyday cleaning. But until we see long-term testing, especially around battery endurance, filtration maintenance, and how pets actually react to that grooming brush, this is firmly in “promising on paper” territory.

If you live in Indonesia and are eyeing the Acerpure Clean V2, keep an eye out for proper reviews and user feedback before jumping in. Features like 20,000 Pa suction and a pet grooming attachment sound good, but real homes and real fur are much harsher judges than spec sheets.

Stay tuned to IntoDroid for more Android updates.

Ubisoft+ on Stadia: Great Idea, Thin Library for $15

The $15 you spend on Ubisoft+ buys you over 100 games on Windows. On Stadia, it currently buys you not even 20.

That’s the trade-off in a nutshell: breadth on PC versus flexibility on Google’s cloud platform. If you live in the Ubisoft ecosystem and bounce between a gaming rig, Chromecast, and Android phone, this new Stadia tie-in is tempting — but it’s very obviously a sidecar to the PC service, not an equal partner.

What Ubisoft+ on Stadia Actually Gives You

Ubisoft+ is a single $15/month subscription that now works across Windows PCs and Google Stadia. On Windows, you get access to a catalog of 100+ Ubisoft titles, from recent AAA releases all the way back to games from the 1990s.

Hook it up to Stadia, and the rules change. Instead of that full PC library, you only get every Ubisoft game that already exists on Stadia. In practice, that’s just shy of 20 titles right now. The win: those Stadia entries are “Ultimate”-style editions — top-tier versions with DLC and extras baked in.

So you’re paying one fee for two very different experiences: a big, traditional PC library plus a smaller, premium slice of that catalog that runs from the cloud on TVs, phones, tablets, and low-power laptops.

Cloud Convenience vs. Catalog Reality

On a technical and lifestyle level, Stadia is clearly framed as an extension of Ubisoft+, not a standalone destination. Stadia lets some of those Ubisoft titles escape the PC box and show up on your living room TV or Android phone without local downloads or beefy GPUs.

That’s the real Android angle here: any decent phone suddenly becomes a Far Cry or Assassin’s Creed machine, assuming your connection holds. You’re essentially renting Ubisoft’s ecosystem once and choosing your screen after the fact.

The catch is obvious: Ubisoft’s back catalog hasn’t magically turned into a cloud-native library. Many older titles were never ported to Stadia at all, and Ubisoft isn’t pretending otherwise. If you’re picturing those 1990s and early 2000s deep cuts streaming to your phone, lower your expectations.

Under 20 Games on Stadia: Is $15 Fair Value?

The number that matters is harsh: from 100+ games on PC down to just under 20 on Stadia. Yes, those Stadia versions tend to be top-tier “Ultimate” editions, and that does have value if you care about full DLC bundles and upgraded versions.

But the math doesn’t disappear. You’re effectively paying for the PC library first, and getting Stadia access as a bonus layer — not the other way around. If you’re Stadia-only and don’t game on Windows, that deal looks a lot weaker.

For multi-platform players, the equation is better. You can grind on PC when you’re at a desk, then pick up on a TV or Android device via Stadia without extra purchases. For anyone who only cares about cloud access, the limited catalog feels like a paywall in front of a half-built store.

Upcoming Titles: Promise, With Built-In Limits

Ubisoft isn’t stopping at the current sub-20 lineup. More games are confirmed, and they’re not just throwaway ports. Assassin’s Creed Syndicate and Assassin’s Creed Unity are slated to join Stadia, expanding the historical chunk of the Ubisoft+ cloud list.

Beyond that, Ubisoft is pushing upcoming releases into the Stadia side too. Riders Republic, Scott Pilgrim vs. The World: The Game, Far Cry 6, and “more” are on the roadmap for the service. The plan is obvious: narrow the gap between the Windows catalog and what’s playable via the cloud.

Even then, expectations are being managed. Ubisoft doesn’t expect some of the very old titles to ever hit Stadia. So the best you can reasonably hope for is a Stadia Ubisoft+ that feels similar in spirit to the PC version, not a 1:1 mirror of the 100+ game library.

Who Should Actually Subscribe Right Now?

If you’re already on Ubisoft+ for PC and you own Stadia-compatible hardware — Chromecast, Android phones, Chromebooks, lightweight laptops — this is a solid upgrade. You unlock cloud access to every Ubisoft game currently on Stadia, and you’ll automatically get new ones as they drop into the subscription.

If you’re primarily a Stadia gamer with no interest in PC gaming, it’s harder to recommend. You’re paying the same $15 that PC players pay, but you’re getting a fraction of the library. The top-tier editions help, but they don’t fully compensate for the smaller catalog.

The smartest buyers are probably the ones who can genuinely use both sides. Think: a Windows machine at home, a Chromecast in the living room, and an Android phone in your pocket. In that scenario, Ubisoft+ becomes a way to carry one account and one subscription across all your screens, even if the cloud side is still missing huge chunks of Ubisoft’s history.

The Bottom Line: Strong Concept, Half-Built Execution

Ubisoft+ on Stadia is a good concept with clear flaws. The integration treats Stadia as a satellite to the main PC service, which is honest but also a bit deflating if you were hoping for full parity.

Right now you’re getting:

  • 100+ games on Windows, including older titles from the 1990s.
  • Just under 20 games on Stadia, all in high-end “Ultimate”-style editions.
  • A growing list of new and upcoming games heading to Stadia, including Far Cry 6 and Riders Republic.
  • No realistic path for many very old PC titles to ever arrive on Google’s cloud.

For Android and cloud-first gamers, this is more of a “nice to have” than a must-subscribe moment. The value improves if you see Stadia as one piece of a bigger Ubisoft+ setup, not your only platform.

If Ubisoft keeps actually adding the promised titles and expanding the Stadia list over the next few months, this could mature into a strong all-access pass to Ubisoft’s modern catalog across PC and cloud. Until then, it’s a cool idea that still feels like a beta phase for anyone living purely in the cloud.

Stay tuned to IntoDroid for more Android updates.

AI.com Just Sold for $70 Million. Is the Hype Worth It?

AI.com Just Sold for $70 Million. Is the Hype Worth It?

AI.com might be the most expensive two letters on the internet—and a excellent snapshot of how wild the AI gold rush has become.

Kris Marszalek, CEO and co-founder of Crypto.com, just bought the domain AI.com for around $70 million (about Rp 1.17 trillion). That instantly puts it in the conversation as one of the priciest domain deals in history.

The bigger question for anyone who actually cares about tech (and not just headlines): what are you really buying for $70 million in 2026?

Two Letters, One of the Priciest Domains Ever

AI.com is about as clean as it gets for branding. Two characters, a .com TLD, and a buzzword that everyone from chipmakers to dating apps is trying to slap on their pitch decks.

Domain names are just human-readable pointers to IP addresses—nothing magical there. But scarcity is real: there’s exactly one AI.com, and Marszalek now owns it.

The reported $70 million price tag pushes it into rare territory. For context, Cars.com was once valued as an intangible asset at around $872.3 million back in 2014. While that wasn’t a straight cash domain sale like this one, it shows how seriously companies treat ultra-generic, high-intent domains with mainstream appeal.

AI.com is the same idea, updated for 2026. In the late 90s, it was all about generic commerce domains. Now, it’s the AI keyword lottery.

Why Crypto.com’s CEO Wants a Second Empire

Despite the eye-watering price, AI.com isn’t replacing Crypto.com’s main identity. Marszalek says he’ll be running two separate entities: Crypto.com and AI.com.

Crypto.com stays in its lane as a crypto exchange platform. Trading, tokens, and everything that lives and dies on speculative markets.

AI.com, meanwhile, is supposed to be a new company focused on AI agents—software-based autonomous agents that don’t just answer prompts but take action on your behalf.

So this isn’t just a domain flip. It’s a pivot: from crypto speculation to AI automation, without abandoning the original business. In other words, diversification—with a $70 million .com as the front door.

AI Agents: Ambitious Pitch, High-Risk Reality

According to Marszalek, AI.com will be a platform for autonomous software agents. Not just chatbots that give you answers, but entities that:

  • Manage tasks
  • Send messages
  • Run workflows across apps
  • Build projects
  • Trade stocks
  • Even update your dating app profiles

This is the logical next step in AI hype: not just talking to an assistant, but letting it actually touch your accounts, data, and money.

In theory, this is powerful. Imagine telling an agent: “Reschedule my meetings, move my investment allocation out of volatile positions, and refresh my dating profile photos,” and it quietly gets everything done.

In practice, this is a minefield. You’re basically handing over control hooks into your digital life and financial footprint to a software platform and trusting it not to:

  • Misinterpret your intent
  • Execute bad trades
  • Send the wrong messages
  • Leak or misuse extremely sensitive personal data

AI.com is being pitched as a secure system, with agents operating inside a setup that uses user-owned encryption keys. That’s the right thing to say in 2026, when everyone is side-eyeing data collection and model training. But there’s a big gap between promising encryption and delivering an end-to-end secure, auditable system that everyday people don’t accidentally misconfigure.

Security, Privacy, and a Massive Trust Problem

The most important part of this whole story isn’t the domain price—it’s the power AI.com wants to have.

If AI agents are going to execute trades, trigger cross-app workflows, and modify your online identities, you’re effectively creating a new attack surface that connects finance, productivity, and personal life in one place.

Marszalek claims these agents will operate in a secure environment using user key–based encryption. That’s promising on paper. User-controlled keys usually mean you have at least some guarantee that data access requires your cryptographic approval.

But people in the real world:

  • Reuse passwords
  • Lose keys
  • Click random links
  • Authorize things they don’t fully understand

The more powerful an AI agent platform is, the more damage a single compromise can cause. A stolen session or hijacked key doesn’t just leak a few emails—it could trigger trades, message contacts, and rewrite your public identity across apps.

For a company already associated with risk-heavy crypto markets, convincing users that this new AI platform is safe won’t be trivial. A giant domain and a Super Bowl ad won’t fix a single security incident if one happens.

Super Bowl Ad + $70M Domain = Old-School Playbook

The timing of AI.com’s launch was matched to a Super Bowl LX commercial in the US. Buy the massive domain, buy the massive ad, blast the brand into the mainstream. Very 2010s Silicon Valley energy.

On one hand, it’s smart. The general public doesn’t care about model architectures, vector databases, or encryption primitives. They remember simple, loud things: a short domain, a catchy ad, a big promise.

On the other hand, the AI space is already drowning in big promises. Everyone claims their agents will change how you work, live, and socialize. Most users just want something that doesn’t hallucinate key details or break when an app UI changes.

AI.com is trying to jump the line by owning the most obvious domain and attaching itself to the biggest ad stage around. Whether the underlying product can justify that spend is a completely different question.

What This Means for the AI and Domain Markets

From a domain perspective, AI.com is a signal: the .com era isn’t dead, even with a flood of new TLDs like .meme and everything else ICANN keeps greenlighting. Generic, high-intent .coms are still assets people will throw tens of millions at.

From an AI perspective, this move is a bet that the next phase of the market is:

  • Less about chat interfaces
  • More about autonomous execution
  • Deeply intertwined with finance, productivity, and identity

It also hints at where crypto and AI narratives are merging: encrypted, user-key-controlled autonomous systems that can touch money and data. It’s a neat story. It’s also one that can go badly if execution is sloppy or if regulation catches up faster than expected.

Right now, AI.com is mostly a symbol: of how expensive hype can get, and how eager founders are to pivot from one hot sector (crypto) into the next (AI agents).

Whether it becomes more than that will depend on boring, unsexy details: security audits, governance models, user controls, and how safely these agents are allowed to plug into your digital life.

Until we see that, AI.com is a $70 million question mark with a great URL.

Check back soon as this story develops.