Category: Hardware

Sony Xperia XZ

Into Droid Leave a comment

The Sony Xperia XZ was a flagship offering from Sony, launched in 2016 as part of the Xperia X series. It aimed to combine Sony’s expertise in camera, display, and design into a premium smartphone experience. Here’s an in-depth review of the Sony Xperia XZ:

Overview:

The Sony Xperia XZ was positioned as a top-tier device in Sony’s lineup, focusing on camera capabilities, a refined design, and high-end performance. It was targeted at users looking for a blend of aesthetics, performance, and multimedia capabilities.

Features:

  1. Operating System: Initially shipped with Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), with subsequent updates available.
  2. Display: 5.2-inch Full HD IPS LCD with a resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, featuring Sony’s TRILUMINOS™ display technology.
  3. Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 Quad-core.
  4. Memory: 3 GB RAM with options of 32/64 GB internal storage, expandable via microSD.
  5. Camera: 23 MP rear sensor with an f/2.0 aperture, predictive hybrid autofocus, and a 13 MP front camera.
  6. Battery: A 2900 mAh non-removable battery with Qnovo Adaptive Charging and Quick Charge 3.0.
  7. Other Features: IP68 dust/waterproof, USB Type-C, fingerprint sensor (region-dependent), and stereo front-facing speakers.

Pros:

  1. Camera: The 23 MP rear camera with predictive hybrid autofocus was designed to capture moving objects with clarity.
  2. Design: The Xperia XZ introduced a new “Loop Surface” design, which was a blend of metal and glass, giving it a distinctive and premium look.
  3. Display: The TRILUMINOS™ display technology offered vibrant colors and good contrast levels.
  4. Water and Dust Resistance: IP68 certification provided peace of mind against accidental spills and dust.

Cons:

  1. Battery Life: The 2900 mAh battery was considered average for a flagship, especially when competitors were offering larger capacities.
  2. Price: The Xperia XZ was priced at a premium, which made it a tough sell against some competitors with similar or better specifications.
  3. RAM: While 3 GB RAM was sufficient for most tasks, competitors were starting to offer 4 GB or more in their flagships.

Comparisons to Other Technologies:

In its price bracket, the Xperia XZ faced competition from:

  • Samsung Galaxy S7: Offering a 5.1-inch Quad HD display, Snapdragon 820/Exynos 8890, and a 12 MP rear camera with dual-pixel technology.
  • LG G5: With its 5.3-inch Quad HD display, Snapdragon 820, and a modular design.
  • HTC 10: Featuring a 5.2-inch Quad HD display, Snapdragon 820, and a focus on audio quality.

Launch Date:

The Sony Xperia XZ was announced in September 2016 and released in October 2016.

Common Issues/Problems:

  1. Camera Distortions: Some users reported distortions in photos, especially when shooting straight lines.
  2. Overheating: Occasional overheating issues were reported, especially during extended camera usage or 4K video recording.
  3. Fingerprint Sensor: The fingerprint sensor was disabled in certain regions, like the US, which was a point of contention for many users.

Conclusion:

The Sony Xperia XZ was a solid flagship offering from Sony, focusing heavily on camera capabilities, design, and multimedia experience. While it had its strengths, such as its camera technology and unique design, it faced stiff competition in its price range, especially in terms of battery capacity and value proposition. For users who were fans of Sony’s design language and camera capabilities, the Xperia XZ was a viable choice in the flagship market of 2016. However, it had challenges standing out in a crowded flagship market.

OnePlus 3

Into Droid 1 Comment

The OnePlus 3, released in 2016, marked a significant step forward for OnePlus. It was a device that truly began to challenge flagship phones from established brands in terms of performance and design, all while maintaining a competitive price point. Here’s an in-depth review of the OnePlus 3:

Overview:

The OnePlus 3 was the company’s fourth smartphone and continued the brand’s “flagship killer” mantra. It combined top-tier specifications with a refined design, making it a compelling choice for those seeking high-end performance without the high-end price.

Features:

  1. Operating System: Initially shipped with Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow) with OnePlus’s OxygenOS skin, later upgradable to Android 9 (Pie).
  2. Display: 5.5-inch Full HD Optic AMOLED with a resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
  3. Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 Quad-core.
  4. Memory: 6 GB RAM with 64 GB internal storage (non-expandable).
  5. Camera: 16 MP rear sensor with an f/2.0 aperture, phase detection autofocus, OIS, and an 8 MP front camera.
  6. Battery: A 3000 mAh non-removable battery with Dash Charge (fast charging).
  7. Other Features: Alert Slider, fingerprint sensor, USB Type-C, and a metal unibody design.

Pros:

  1. Performance: With the Snapdragon 820 and a whopping 6 GB of RAM, the OnePlus 3 was a performance beast, handling everything from daily tasks to intensive gaming with ease.
  2. Design: The metal unibody design gave the OnePlus 3 a premium feel, a significant upgrade from the previous models.
  3. Dash Charge: OnePlus’s proprietary fast charging solution was incredibly fast, offering a day’s power in half an hour.
  4. Price: Despite its flagship-level specs, the OnePlus 3 was priced significantly lower than competitors.

Cons:

  1. Battery Life: While the 3000 mAh battery was decent, it wasn’t the best in its class. However, Dash Charge somewhat mitigated this.
  2. No Expandable Storage: The device came with a fixed 64 GB of storage with no option for expansion via microSD.
  3. Camera: While good, the camera wasn’t quite on par with some of the best in the industry, especially in low-light conditions.

Comparisons to Other Technologies:

In its segment, the OnePlus 3 faced competition from:

  • Samsung Galaxy S7: Offering a 5.1-inch Quad HD Super AMOLED display, Exynos 8890/Snapdragon 820, and a standout camera.
  • LG G5: With its 5.3-inch Quad HD display, Snapdragon 820, and a modular design.
  • HTC 10: Featuring a 5.2-inch Quad HD display, Snapdragon 820, and a focus on audio quality.

Launch Date:

The OnePlus 3 was announced and released in June 2016.

Common Issues/Problems:

  1. Display Calibration: Early units of the OnePlus 3 faced criticism for their color calibration. OnePlus later addressed this with a software update.
  2. RAM Management: Despite having 6 GB of RAM, aggressive RAM management in the initial software versions led to apps being closed prematurely. This was also addressed in subsequent updates.
  3. General Software Bugs: Some users reported occasional software bugs and crashes, though many of these were ironed out in updates.

Conclusion:

The OnePlus 3 was a significant milestone for OnePlus. It showcased the company’s ability to produce a device that could genuinely compete with the big players in the smartphone industry. With its powerful specs, premium design, and competitive price, it was a favorite among tech enthusiasts and general consumers alike. While it had its quirks, the overall package was compelling, solidifying OnePlus’s reputation as a brand that delivers value for money.

Motorola Moto G4

Into Droid 3 Comments

The Motorola Moto G4 was the fourth generation of Motorola’s popular Moto G series, which was known for offering solid specifications and a near-stock Android experience at an affordable price point. Here’s an in-depth review of the Motorola Moto G4:

Overview:

The Moto G4 continued Motorola’s tradition of delivering value-for-money smartphones. With its larger display, improved camera, and the promise of timely software updates, it aimed to be a top contender in the mid-range segment.

Features:

  1. Operating System: Shipped with Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 7.0 (Nougat). Motorola’s near-stock Android experience was a highlight.
  2. Display: 5.5-inch Full HD IPS LCD with a resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
  3. Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 Octa-core.
  4. Memory: Options of 2 GB RAM with 16 GB or 32 GB internal storage, expandable via microSD up to 256 GB.
  5. Camera: 13 MP rear sensor with an f/2.0 aperture and a 5 MP front camera.
  6. Battery: A 3000 mAh non-removable battery with TurboPower charging.
  7. Other Features: Water repellent nano-coating and front-facing speakers.

Pros:

  1. Display: The jump to a Full HD display was a significant upgrade from the previous generation, offering sharper visuals.
  2. Software Experience: Motorola’s minimalistic approach to software meant that the Moto G4 offered a near-stock Android experience, which many users appreciated.
  3. Battery Life: With a 3000 mAh battery and efficient software optimizations, the Moto G4 had commendable battery life.
  4. TurboPower Charging: The device supported Motorola’s fast charging solution, allowing for quick top-ups.

Cons:

  1. Lack of NFC: The Moto G4 did not come with NFC, which meant no Android Pay or easy device pairing.
  2. No Fingerprint Sensor: While the Moto G4 Plus variant had a fingerprint sensor, the standard G4 missed out on this feature.
  3. Camera Performance in Low Light: The camera performed decently in well-lit conditions but struggled in low-light scenarios.

Comparisons to Other Technologies:

In its segment, the Moto G4 faced competition from:

Launch Date:

The Motorola Moto G4 was announced in May 2016 and released in June 2016.

Common Issues/Problems:

  1. Ghost Touch Issues: Some users reported issues with the touchscreen registering phantom touches or becoming unresponsive.
  2. Overheating: The Snapdragon 617 was known to get warm under heavy usage, and some Moto G4 users reported overheating issues, especially during prolonged gaming or camera usage.
  3. Delayed Software Updates: While Motorola initially had a reputation for quick software updates, some users felt that updates for the Moto G4 were slower than expected.

Conclusion:

The Motorola Moto G4 was a worthy successor in the Moto G lineup, offering several improvements over its predecessor. While it had its shortcomings, the combination of a Full HD display, near-stock Android experience, and competitive pricing made it a popular choice among budget-conscious consumers. The Moto G series continued to solidify its reputation as a reliable and value-packed option in the mid-range smartphone market.

Sony Xperia XA

Into Droid Leave a comment

The Sony Xperia XA was a part of Sony’s Xperia X series, positioned as a mid-range offering with a focus on design and camera capabilities. Launched in 2016, the Xperia XA aimed to deliver a blend of style and performance at a more affordable price point. Here’s an in-depth review of the Sony Xperia XA:

Overview:

The Sony Xperia XA was designed to cater to the mid-range segment, offering a sleek design, decent camera, and a balanced performance. It was positioned for users who wanted a taste of Sony’s smartphone experience without spending on the flagship range.

Features:

  1. Operating System: Initially shipped with Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), with subsequent updates.
  2. Display: 5.0-inch HD IPS LCD with a resolution of 720 x 1280 pixels.
  3. Processor: MediaTek Helio P10 Octa-core.
  4. Memory: 2 GB RAM with 16 GB internal storage, expandable via microSD up to 256 GB.
  5. Camera: 13 MP rear sensor with an f/2.0 aperture and an 8 MP front camera with a wide-angle lens.
  6. Battery: A 2300 mAh non-removable battery.
  7. Other Features: Edge-to-edge display design, NFC, and micro USB charging.

Pros:

  1. Design: The edge-to-edge display design gave the XA a modern and sleek look, making it stand out in its price range.
  2. Camera: The 13 MP rear camera was capable of capturing decent photos, especially in well-lit conditions.
  3. Compact Size: The 5.0-inch form factor made it easy to handle and use with one hand.

Cons:

  1. Battery Life: The 2300 mAh battery was relatively small, leading to average battery life.
  2. Display Resolution: A 720p resolution was somewhat dated for 2016, especially when considering the device’s price point.
  3. Performance: The MediaTek Helio P10 was decent but lagged behind some competitors in terms of raw performance.

Comparisons to Other Technologies:

In its price bracket, the Xperia XA faced competition from:

  • Moto G4: Offering a 5.5-inch Full HD display, Snapdragon 617, and a more stock-like Android experience.
  • Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016): With its 5.2-inch HD display, Snapdragon 410, and a Super AMOLED screen.
  • Huawei P9 Lite: Featuring a 5.2-inch Full HD display, Kirin 650, and a fingerprint sensor.

Launch Date:

The Sony Xperia XA was announced in February 2016 and released in June 2016.

Common Issues/Problems:

  1. Battery Life: Many users reported that the battery life was not sufficient to last through a full day of moderate use.
  2. Performance Hiccups: Occasional lags and stutters were reported, especially with multitasking or heavy apps.
  3. Build Quality: Some users mentioned that the plastic build felt less premium compared to other devices in the same price range.

Conclusion:

The Sony Xperia XA was a stylish mid-range offering from Sony, focusing on design and camera capabilities. While it had its strengths, especially in terms of design, it faced challenges in terms of battery life, display resolution, and performance. For users who prioritized aesthetics and were fans of Sony’s software experience, the Xperia XA was a decent choice in the mid-range segment. However, it had to contend with other offerings that provided better value in certain areas.