Category: Hardware

LG V30

Into Droid 2 Comments

The LG V30 was a part of LG’s V series, which was known for its focus on multimedia capabilities and unique design elements. Launched in 2017, the LG V30 was positioned as a high-end device, emphasizing audio, video, and camera capabilities. Here’s an in-depth review of the LG V30:

Overview:

The LG V30 aimed to cater to audiophiles, content creators, and users who wanted a premium smartphone experience with a particular emphasis on multimedia. It was designed to be sleek, powerful, and feature-rich.

Features:

  1. Operating System: Shipped with Android 7.1.2 (Nougat), upgradable to later versions.
  2. Display: 6.0-inch P-OLED with a resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, supporting HDR10 and Dolby Vision.
  3. Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 835.
  4. Memory: 4 GB RAM with 64 GB/128 GB (V30+) internal storage options, expandable via microSD.
  5. Camera: Dual-camera setup with a 16 MP primary sensor and a 13 MP wide-angle lens. The front camera is a 5 MP shooter.
  6. Battery: 3300 mAh non-removable battery with fast charging and wireless charging support.
  7. Other Features: Quad DAC for superior audio playback, IP68 dust/water resistance, rear-mounted fingerprint scanner, and USB Type-C.

Pros:

  1. Audio Capabilities: The Quad DAC in the V30 was a highlight, offering superior audio playback through headphones.
  2. Camera Flexibility: The dual-camera setup, especially the wide-angle lens, allowed for creative photography and videography.
  3. Build and Design: The device featured a premium build with a glass back and an aluminum frame, giving it a sleek and modern look.
  4. Display Quality: The P-OLED display was vibrant and sharp, offering good color reproduction and deep blacks.

Cons:

  1. Front Camera: The 5 MP front camera was considered modest and didn’t match the quality of some competitors.
  2. Software Experience: While LG’s UX was feature-rich, some users found it to be cluttered compared to stock Android or other custom UIs.
  3. Battery Life: Given the device’s powerful specs and large display, some users felt the battery life could have been better.

Comparisons to Other Technologies:

In its segment, the V30 faced competition from:

  • Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Offering a Super AMOLED display, Snapdragon 835/Exynos 8895, and a dual-camera setup.
  • iPhone 8 Plus: Featuring a Retina IPS LCD display, Apple’s A11 Bionic chip, and a dual-camera system.
  • Google Pixel 2 XL: With its 6-inch P-OLED display, Snapdragon 835, and a highly-praised single-camera system.

Launch Date:

The LG V30 was announced in August 2017 and became available in various markets in September 2017.

Common Issues/Problems:

  1. Screen Uniformity: Some early units of the V30 had issues with screen uniformity, where certain areas of the display would show uneven brightness or color.
  2. Front Camera Quality: The front camera was often criticized for producing soft images, especially in low light.
  3. Software Updates: Like many other manufacturers, LG was sometimes slow in providing software updates, which was a point of contention for some users.

Conclusion:

The LG V30 was a solid offering in the high-end segment, particularly standing out for its audio and video capabilities. It catered especially to audiophiles and content creators, offering features that were unique in its class. While it had its shortcomings, especially in terms of the front camera and software experience, the overall package was compelling for those who prioritized multimedia capabilities in their smartphone.

Google Pixel 2

Into Droid Leave a comment

Overview:

The Google Pixel 2, unveiled in 2017, was the successor to the original Pixel. Google continued its emphasis on camera capabilities, software experience, and the integration of the Google Assistant. The Pixel 2 aimed to refine the experience of its predecessor while addressing some of its criticisms.

Features:

  • Operating System: Launched with Android 8.0 Oreo, with the promise of direct and timely updates from Google.
  • Display: 5.0-inch AMOLED capacitive touchscreen with a resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
  • Processor: Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 Octa-core.
  • Memory: 4 GB RAM with options of 64/128 GB internal storage (non-expandable).
  • Camera: 12.2 MP rear camera with laser and phase detection autofocus, optical and electronic image stabilization, and an 8 MP front camera.
  • Battery: 2700 mAh non-removable battery with fast charging capabilities.
  • Connectivity: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, and GPS.
  • Other Features: Fingerprint sensor (rear-mounted), USB Type-C, water and dust resistance (IP67), stereo front-facing speakers, and deep integration of Google Assistant.

Pros:

  • Camera Excellence: The Pixel 2’s camera was lauded for its outstanding performance, especially in low light and for its portrait mode, even without a dual-camera setup.
  • Pure Android Experience: The Pixel 2 offered a stock Android experience with the added benefit of prompt updates.
  • Water and Dust Resistance: The addition of IP67 certification was a welcome improvement over its predecessor.
  • Performance: With the Snapdragon 835 and 4 GB RAM, the device delivered a smooth and responsive user experience.
  • Front-Facing Stereo Speakers: The stereo speakers provided a richer audio experience compared to many competitors.

Cons:

  • No Headphone Jack: Google’s decision to remove the 3.5mm headphone jack was controversial and not well-received by all users.
  • Design: While the build quality was solid, the design, especially the large bezels, felt somewhat dated in comparison to the competition.
  • Battery Life: The 2700 mAh battery was adequate but not exceptional, especially when compared to some other flagship devices.

Comparisons to Other Technologies:

In 2017, the smartphone market saw several innovations and design shifts. The Google Pixel 2 faced competition from:

  • iPhone 8: Apple’s offering with its A11 Bionic chip, wireless charging, and iOS ecosystem.
  • Samsung Galaxy S8: Known for its Infinity Display, premium design, and robust feature set.
  • OnePlus 5T: Offering high-end specs with a more affordable price tag.

Launch Date:

The Google Pixel 2 was announced in October 2017 and released later that month.

Common Issues/Problems:

  • Display Issues: Some early users reported issues with the Pixel 2 XL’s display, including muted colors, blue shift, and burn-in. While the standard Pixel 2 was less affected, it wasn’t entirely immune to these concerns.
  • Audio Quality: Some users reported buzzing and clicking sounds in the earpiece during calls.
  • Software Bugs: As with any new device, there were occasional software bugs, though Google was relatively prompt in addressing them with updates.

Conclusion:

The Google Pixel 2 built upon the foundation set by its predecessor, offering an even better camera, improved build, and the latest software features directly from Google. While it faced stiff competition and had its share of controversies, especially concerning the display, it solidified Google’s position in the premium smartphone segment. For those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem or those prioritizing camera and software experience, the Pixel 2 was a compelling choice.

Sony Xperia XA1 Plus

Into Droid Leave a comment

The Sony Xperia XA1 Plus was part of Sony’s mid-range lineup, released in 2017. It aimed to offer a balance between performance, design, and price. Here’s an in-depth review of the Sony Xperia XA1 Plus:

Overview:

The Xperia XA1 Plus was a continuation of Sony’s OmniBalance design philosophy, characterized by its rectangular shape and side-mounted fingerprint scanner. Positioned in the mid-range segment, it sought to offer a good camera experience and solid performance for its price point.

Features:

  1. Operating System: Initially shipped with Android 7.0 (Nougat) and later received updates.
  2. Display: 5.5-inch Full HD IPS LCD with a resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
  3. Processor: MediaTek Helio P20.
  4. Memory: Options of 3/4 GB RAM with 32/64 GB internal storage, expandable via microSD.
  5. Camera: 23 MP rear sensor with an f/2.0 aperture and phase detection autofocus. The front camera is an 8 MP shooter.
  6. Battery: A 3430 mAh non-removable battery with Pump Express+ 2.0 fast charging.
  7. Other Features: Side-mounted fingerprint sensor, USB Type-C, and NFC.

Pros:

  1. Camera: The 23 MP camera was one of the highlights, offering decent shots, especially in well-lit conditions.
  2. Design: The phone’s design was typical of Sony, offering a distinct look that stood out from the rounded designs of many competitors.
  3. Battery Life: The 3430 mAh battery combined with the Full HD display and efficient processor led to commendable battery life.
  4. Performance: For its price point, the Helio P20 provided adequate performance for everyday tasks.

Cons:

  1. Processor Choice: While the MediaTek Helio P20 was decent, competitors in the same price range sometimes offered Qualcomm Snapdragon processors, which were often preferred by consumers.
  2. Bezels: The phone had noticeable top and bottom bezels, which started to look dated as the market moved towards more bezel-less designs.
  3. Software Updates: Sony’s mid-range devices typically didn’t receive as frequent software updates as their flagship counterparts.

Comparisons to Other Technologies:

In its price bracket, the Xperia XA1 Plus faced competition from:

  • Moto G5 Plus: Offering a 5.2-inch Full HD display, Snapdragon 625, and a metal design.
  • Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro: With its 5.5-inch Full HD Super AMOLED display, Exynos 7870, and a premium metal body.
  • Nokia 6: Featuring a 5.5-inch Full HD display, Snapdragon 430, and a solid metal unibody design.

Launch Date:

The Sony Xperia XA1 Plus was announced in August 2017 and became available in various markets in October 2017.

Common Issues/Problems:

  1. Touchscreen Issues: Some users reported issues with the touchscreen becoming unresponsive over time.
  2. Software Glitches: Occasional software bugs and glitches were reported, though some were addressed in updates.
  3. Camera Performance in Low Light: While the camera was decent in good lighting, its performance in low-light conditions was not as strong.

Conclusion:

The Sony Xperia XA1 Plus was a solid mid-range offering from Sony, aiming to provide a balanced smartphone experience at a more affordable price point. Its camera and design were standout features, but it faced stiff competition in a segment where every brand was trying to offer the best value for money. For Sony enthusiasts or those looking for a reliable mid-ranger with a good camera, the XA1 Plus was a viable option. However, those seeking the best specs for their money might have been tempted by other offerings in the market.

Motorola Moto X4

Into Droid Leave a comment

The Motorola Moto X4 was a part of Motorola’s mid-range lineup, aiming to offer a blend of performance, design, and camera capabilities at a more affordable price point compared to flagship devices. Launched in late 2017, the Moto X4 was a successor to the Moto X series, bringing back the lineup after a hiatus. Here’s an in-depth review of the Motorola Moto X4:

Overview:

The Moto X4 was designed for users who wanted a solid mid-range smartphone experience with a touch of Motorola’s design and camera expertise. With its signature design, decent specifications, and camera capabilities, it catered to users looking for a reliable daily driver with a focus on multimedia and photography.

Features:

  1. Operating System: Shipped with Android 7.1 (Nougat) and later received updates to Android 9.0 (Pie).
  2. Display: 5.2-inch LTPS IPS LCD with a resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
  3. Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 630.
  4. Memory: Options of 3/4 GB RAM with 32/64 GB internal storage, expandable via microSDXC.
  5. Camera: Dual-camera setup – 12 MP primary sensor and an 8 MP ultra-wide sensor. The front camera is a 16 MP shooter with a dedicated flash.
  6. Battery: A 3000 mAh non-removable battery with TurboCharge (fast charging).
  7. Other Features: Front-mounted fingerprint sensor, USB Type-C, NFC, IP68 water and dust resistance.

Pros:

  1. Camera Capabilities: The dual-camera setup provided versatility with its ultra-wide-angle lens.
  2. Build and Design: The Moto X4 featured a glass back with an aluminum frame, giving it a premium feel. The design was compact and ergonomic.
  3. Water and Dust Resistance: IP68 certification was a notable feature in its price range.
  4. Moto Experiences: Motorola’s suite of gestures and features, like the chop-chop for flashlight and twist for camera, added convenience.

Cons:

  1. Battery Life: While decent, the 3000 mAh battery might not be enough for heavy users to last a full day.
  2. Camera Performance in Low Light: The camera struggled in low-light scenarios compared to some competitors.
  3. Software Updates: While the device did receive updates, they weren’t as frequent as some users would have liked.

Comparisons to Other Technologies:

In its price bracket, the Moto X4 faced competition from:

  • Nokia 6.1: Offering a 5.5-inch IPS LCD display, Snapdragon 630, and a solid build with Android One certification.
  • Sony Xperia XA2: With its 5.2-inch IPS LCD display, Snapdragon 630, and a focus on camera capabilities.
  • Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018): Featuring a 5.6-inch Super AMOLED display, Exynos 7885, and a dual front camera setup.

Launch Date:

The Motorola Moto X4 was announced in August 2017 and became available in various markets shortly after.

Common Issues/Problems:

  1. Software Performance: Some users reported occasional slowdowns and stutters, especially when running multiple apps.
  2. Camera Software: Some users found the camera software to be a bit clunky and not as intuitive as competitors.
  3. Glass Back: The glass back, while premium, was prone to fingerprints and potential breakage if dropped.

Conclusion:

The Motorola Moto X4 was a solid mid-range offering, especially for those who are fans of Motorola’s design and software features. Its performance, build quality, and camera setup made it a worthy contender in the mid-range segment. While it had its limitations, especially in terms of camera performance in low light and battery life, its overall package was quite compelling for its price segment. For users looking for a reliable device with a focus on design and a clean software experience, the Moto X4 was a good choice. However, those looking for better camera capabilities or a larger battery might have considered other options available in the market at the time.